• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

'99.9pc certainty' of Noah's Ark

Mr Casson

Mr Casson

Well-known member
One question...

Had no one ever been up this mountain before and wondered how a ****ing boat got up it?
 
HeathDavisSpeed

HeathDavisSpeed

Well-known member
Ah, but they've been rubbishing science for so long, but have still relied on the hitherto religiously unreliable radio-carbon dating to ascertain how old the wood is. Obviously, the fact it comes out at 4,800 years old and the "unreliable" dating of older specimens actually means that the boat crashed at the top of the mountain about 2 minutes and 55 seconds ago.

Seriously, cock the **** off. I'm not in the mood for this unadulterated bull****.
 
silentstriker

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Yea, I thought carbon dating was evil and unreliable? Or is it reliable when they do it? Plus, someone had calculated that the boat would have had to be the size of Ireland.
 
Flem274*

Flem274*

123/5
It's plausible this is the ark. Many legends and religious stories have some factual truth to them. it's highly likely Jesus walked the Earth, for example, but that doesn't mean he was ressurected.

Some guy called Noah probably built a boat when a (relatively) small section of his country got smashed by an uber-flood and, believing it was the end of the world, piled some goats on it. Then through thousands of years the story got stretched a little.
 
Scaly piscine

Scaly piscine

Well-known member
Very dangerous when you get science with bits of religious quietly thrown in.

Throwing nonsensical percentages in, not like a filmmaker in a group called Noah's Ark Ministries International would have any bias there.

Then said group takes it upon itself to rule out the possibility of a residence because they haven't found any others that high. Hmm flawless logic that. Perhaps they'd like to rule out the height of Mount Everest because they'd not seen any other mountains that high?
 
S

Steulen

Well-known member
Just sink to your knees and pray, boys, it's all true.

**** **** **** ****, and for good measure: **** (the last one's in capitals).
 
Matt79

Matt79

Global Moderator
Love these pseudo science efforts. Come back when you have some peer-reviewed research boys.
 
Matt79

Matt79

Global Moderator
What did they tigers eat while they were on the boat for forty days? Did they have a pair of Bengal, Siberian AND Sumatran tigers? What about dawgs. If there's no such thing as evolution, did they have two of every breed of dawg? Who fed all these animals, and with what? Were there still only two rabbits at the end of the trip? Because those things breed pretty fast. Was it Noah who ferried the two AIDS viruses to safety?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top