TheJediBrah
Well-known member
You wouldn't sound so dumb if you didn't post about things you know **** all about (ie. cricket)
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* 2nd Test at Lord's
- Thread starter Spark
- Start date
Coming from you? Your arse must be jealous of the **** you splatter all over this forum.
Got him both times. Surprised at his figures 29-4-102-2 though after his 7 wickets in the 1st Test. Maybe due to his injury.
TheJediBrah
Well-known member
vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
Bit sick of people talking about Smith's technique as well.
It's really pretty similar to Amla.
It's really pretty similar to Amla.
Gob
Well-known member
You read my mind
Took people awhile to believe in amla too to be fair.
wellAlbidarned
Well-known member
Amla's technique needs a "kids, don't try this at home" disclaimer attached.
Top_Cat
Well-known member
Agreed.
Uppercut
Well-known member
Didn't Bradman walk across his stumps and play to leg a lot? Or did I dream that.
A lot of enormously successful batsmen have done it so I don't even understand what's supposed to be "flawed" about it.
Last edited:
Son Of Coco
Well-known member
You mentioned technique...I was just giving Root the props for having a wonderful technique, but pointing out technique means nothing really. So the point in mentioning it at all when talking about batting at 3, or mentioning it all the time when talking about Smith, kind of escaped me.
Last edited:
Son Of Coco
Well-known member
You tell me what my definitive stance is...then I'll tell you if I'm serious.
(Chances are I'm not overly serious).
Son Of Coco
Well-known member
As an Australian supporter I wouldn't be concerned if Hales held the bat between his arse cheeks while someone spun him around like a windmill.
Begs the question why you jumped in so vehemently then.
Spikey
Well-known member
Son Of Coco
Well-known member
It was really just to talk up Smith's successes and Root's failure. It's all I live for.
I'm also equally mystified about all the discussion over Smith's technique. Anyone talking about it still clearly hasn't been paying attention.
Hurricane
Well-known member
I Agree I think anyone who is questioning Smith's technique is a fundamentally flawed human being.
OverratedSanity
Well-known member
Haha I agree that calling Smith's technique bad is silly, but this is a bit far.