harsh.ag
Well-known member
Competence here is defined as being able to generate profit. If a highly competent employee turns out to have wronged a much less competent one, what should be the appropriate response from the company's pov? Is it better to cut them loose, or should the possibility of them being snapped up by rivals and taking away business and profit be held more important? What if they are central to the operations of a company and very difficult to replace in the short run? Would you consider this an easy question if you were the top management/shareholder of the company? Is the old wisdom of "they will cost you too much in the long run" applicable? Perhaps groom someone to replace them and then let them go?
Is there a sliding scale here, some threshold of loss beyond which your answer would change?
Is there a sliding scale here, some threshold of loss beyond which your answer would change?