Note the comparisons.luckyeddie said:Finally, can the morons in the media stop rattling on about 1966 and Hurst?
Coming shortly....marc71178 said:Note the comparisons.
Opposition equalize with last kick of normal time after England should've been awarded the free kick / penalty.
England's hero scores in the last minute to clinch the trophy.
Erm, that's it.
It's not like it would have made any difference, is it?Mr. Ponting said:Not wanting to complain, but drop goals should be one point like league!:!(
Wilkinson scored a drop goal in regulation time. We would have won by two points and there would have been no need for the extra time.Craig said:Either way, England would of won Guy.
You are imagining thingsMr. Ponting said:Wilkinson scored a drop goal in regulation time. We would have won by two points and there would have been no need for the extra time.
Australia to retrospectively push for a rule change in 5...4....3....Mr. Ponting said:Wilkinson scored a drop goal in regulation time. We would have won by two points and there would have been no need for the extra time.
Had the ref done his job properly in the last 2 or 3 minutes, there would've been no need for extra time anyway.Mr. Ponting said:Wilkinson scored a drop goal in regulation time. We would have won by two points and there would have been no need for the extra time.
Then introduce a 5th tackle rule and get rid of the two superfluous players, and we're sorted!luckyeddie said:Australia to retrospectively push for a rule change in 5...4....3....
Anyway, he didn't (and if they were only worth 1 point each, the game would take on a completely different complexion)
A good point, though. I would go further - reduce the conversion and penalties to 1 point too, but be far stricter regarding infringements (especially regarding the awatding of penalty tries)