• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Captain of 1946-2006 World XI

Captain of 1946-2006 World Test XI


  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .

aussie tragic

Well-known member
Please select a Captain for the 1946-2006 XI (Criteria is to have won at least one test as captain)

1. Sunil Gavaskar: 47 tests, 9W (19%), 30D (64%), 8L (17%)
2. Len Hutton: 23 tests, 11W (48%), 8D (35%), 4L (17%)
3. Viv Richards: 50 tests, 27W (54%), 15D (30%), 8L (16%)
4. Sachin Tendulkar: 25 tests, 4W (16%), 12D (48%), 9L (36%)
5. Brian Lara: 47 tests, 10W (21%), 11D (23%), 26L (55%)
6. Garry Sobers: 39 tests, 9W (23%), 20D (51%), 10L (26%)
7. Adam Gilchrist: 6 tests, 4W (67%), 1D (17%), 1L (17%)


The 1946-2006 World Test XI:

1. Sunil Gavaskar (51.12)
2. Len Hutton (54.62)
3. Viv Richards (50.23)
4. Sachin Tendulkar (55.11)
5. Brian Lara (52.88)
6. Gary Sobers (57.78) and (Bowl: 34.03)
7. Adam Gilchrist (48.98)
8. Malcom Marshall (18.85) and (Bowl: 20.94)
9. Shane Warne (17.03) and (Bowl: 25.35)
10. Muttiah Muralitharan (11.75) and (Bowl: 21.73)
11. Glenn McGrath (7.45) and (Bowl: 21.65)

12. Dennis Lillee (13.71) and (Bowl: 23.92)
 
Last edited:

aussie tragic

Well-known member
I never thought that selection of an all-time 1946-2006 captain could be so lame, however at least we haven't fallen to English standards of picking a captain first (e.g Brearley) and then the team.......

I think Hutton would be the obvious captain, however I voted Richards thinking it would at least give a vote for the coolest cricketer ever (however he's now tied with Hutton :))
 

JBH001

Well-known member
Better. Of course, now you need a poll on which of the two spinners he would replace. :shock:

:D ;)

That should not be necessary, Murali received 1 more vote than Warne (21 - 20).

Therefore, Warney gets to carry the drinks when 2 spinners are not required.

;) :D
 

LongHopCassidy

Well-known member
The major issue here is that there's no obvious standout, and for good reason. Hutton and Richards both command superlative stats as captains, but neither were particularly lauded for their tactical acumen - or indeed, as leaders of men.

Maybe this side needs a specialist captain - it would be far more beneficial to see a united side than simply a team of champions - a combination that isn't guaranteed success (see the ICC World XI). It doesn't necessarily have to be a dire batsman such as Brearley, but it could be someone like Frank Worrell, Ian Chappell, Richie Benaud or Imran Khan - none of whom disgraced themselves at their respective callings, and distinguished themselves as leaders of men and tacticians.
 

adharcric

Well-known member
I don't think Hutton or Richards would be poor captains. They may not be legendary captains or great tacticians or leaders but surely they were decent captains.
 

LongHopCassidy

Well-known member
I'm just saying that since Ponting is only really distinguished by his statistics, that it's not out of the realm of possibility that Hutton and Lloyd are too. Hence I believe that this team is being robbed of its true potential by not having an exceptional strategist or leader at the helm, and that the slight compromise in cricketing skill that this would entail is outweighed by the leadership contributions that would be made.
 
Top