1) Evidence?And Bradman had a poor quidditch record.
My arse. As in, pulled out of.1) Evidence?
www.statsguru.espnquidditchinfo.com2) What stats are used to rate quidditch players?
Paging kyear2, watson et al...3) ATG quidditch team picking only cricketers, go
My remark was probably not called for.And Bradman had a poor quidditch record. What's the relevance?
The batsmen to hit ODI 200's have been decent ODI players against decent opposition and that is all that matters.
If you read my post carefully you will see I was not talking about Shewag.
Virus reach twice 300 in test
Once reach 293 and out,
V.shewag and Bradman did in test,
AgreedOk despite it being in India scoring dbl tons in odis isn't like every other day now is it? Big up for Rohit for his magnificent achievements and his most recent innings against Australia. He's a class player.
Agreed.As far as I'm concerned, the day someone scores 300+ in a ODI is the day the ICC should officially rebrand it as Stick Cricket and give up on it being a meaningful competition.
For someone to basically go at 2 a ball for an entire 50 over game is either an indication the grounds are too small/flat and deliberately designed for big runs, or the rules are skewed to favour batting over bowling far too much, or simply the quality in the bowling side is non-existant.
The game stops being interesting if you dilute the skills required to excel so much.