• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

A coincidence? or something more sinister?

age_master

Well-known member
INCREDIBLE historical coincidences sent in to us by Ross Macpherson:

* Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846; John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
* Lincoln became President in 1860; Kennedy in 1960.
* Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
* Both wives lost a child while living in the White House.
* Both were shot on a Friday.
* Both were shot in the head.
* Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy; Kennedy's secretary was called Lincoln.
* Both Presidents were assassinated by Southerners.
* Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
* Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808; Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
* John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
* Both assassins had three names; both names are composed of 15 letters.
* Lincoln was shot at the theatre named Ford.
* Kennedy was shot in a car called Lincoln, made by Ford.
* Booth and Oswald were murdered before their trials.
* Lincoln was shot in a theatre and the assassin ran to a warehouse; Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and the killer ran to a theatre.

from the daily telegraph....
 

Kweek

Well-known member
yeah :) they were in a dutch tv show a while back. very interesting stuff indeed...
 

Mister Wright

Well-known member
Considering Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the person who Murdered Kennedy and it was infact the CIA it could give a reason as to why there are so many similarities due to LHO's framing.
 

dinu23

Well-known member
age_master said:
INCREDIBLE historical coincidences sent in to us by Ross Macpherson:

* Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846; John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
* Lincoln became President in 1860; Kennedy in 1960.
* Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
* Both wives lost a child while living in the White House.
* Both were shot on a Friday.
* Both were shot in the head.
* Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy; Kennedy's secretary was called Lincoln.
* Both Presidents were assassinated by Southerners.
* Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
* Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808; Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
* John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
* Both assassins had three names; both names are composed of 15 letters.
* Lincoln was shot at the theatre named Ford.
* Kennedy was shot in a car called Lincoln, made by Ford.
* Booth and Oswald were murdered before their trials.
* Lincoln was shot in a theatre and the assassin ran to a warehouse; Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and the killer ran to a theatre.

from the daily telegraph....
pretty weird isn't it? there was a programme on Discovery Channel about it. Amazing stuff.
 

andyc

Well-known member
Mister Wright said:
Considering Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the person who Murdered Kennedy and it was infact the CIA it could give a reason as to why there are so many similarities due to LHO's framing.
yes kyle, and they're all out to get you :p
 

roseboy64

Cricket Web Content Updater
Word. It is a bit coincidental you have to admit but I guess they're just trying fervently to prove it wrong.
 

Top_Cat

Well-known member
hmm i think that page takes things a little too seriously
In that instance maybe but in so many of the other urban legends proven to be false/true on that site, they would likely save lives. So I'll let them have this one. :)
 

Top_Cat

Well-known member
How does a debunked urban legend save a life?
Not so much in what is debunked but in what is confirmed/denied;

http://www.snopes.com/crime/warnings/warnings.asp

http://www.snopes.com/toxins/toxins.asp

And there are many more nestled deep within that site.

Information when it's truth is yet to be determined can always be dangerous. When the suggestion that American forces in GitMo had dropped a Qu'Raan into a toilet as a torture technique was first raised, before anyone knew whether it was true or not, protests in the Middle-East ended up in the deaths of 15 people.
 
Top