• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

quantum of solace

Anil

Well-known member
reactions? it was slick, fast-paced, maybe too fast, overall worth a watch, not as good as casino royale in my opinion..
 

Ponting Man

Well-known member
Sounds really weird because all the others had normal names easy to understand like Die another day and Casino Royal but it sounds like an alright movie. I might see it.:dry:
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
The important question is: What did you think of the new Star Trek trailer that was shown before the movie?? :cool:
 

Anil

Well-known member
The important question is: What did you think of the new Star Trek trailer that was shown before the movie?? :cool:
they didn't show that at the cinema i went to...did you like the movie? it was a departure from the usual bond movies, even more so than casino royale, thought they could have incorporated the usual first scene of the villainous eye following bond and him turning and shooting, also the typical background music...they did it at the very end but i missed it during the movie itself...doesn't have the feel of a proper bond movie without those...
 
Last edited:

pasag

RTDAS
Can't wait, really enjoyed the last one, especially after how poor it was getting towards the end of the Brosnan era.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Too much departure from the usual Bond formula for me. I am the average moviegoer who expects a few things beforehand and though Casino Royale too was "different" from the usual bond, this is taking matters to a different level. Sanitisation of Bond. Give me Bourne anyday.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Too much departure from the usual Bond formula for me. I am the average moviegoer who expects a few things beforehand and though Casino Royale too was "different" from the usual bond, this is taking matters to a different level. Sanitisation of Bond. Give me Bourne anyday.
Depends on what you call different really. These few are pretty similar to the two Dalton ones and by all accounts are as close to the Fleming novels as we've ever seen. The last few Brosnan films were absolute rubbish, not just the worst Bond films I'd seen but some of the worst films ever. The new direction is finally giving some substance to the series which is needed as it tends to become a parody of itself from time to time (see the end of the Moore era).
 

Craig

World Traveller
Going to see it on Friday at this stage. I never saw Casino Royale. Should I watch it before to get this movie or does it not matter?
 

luffy

Well-known member
From what I heard it is a sequel to Casino Royale, but doesn't incorporate that film into it so much.
 

vogue

Well-known member
reactions? it was slick, fast-paced, maybe too fast, overall worth a watch, not as good as casino royale in my opinion..
...it is worth going to see(and i admit to the fact i go to watch mainly because i rather like mr craig and the very nice aston martin he drives...).....it isnt as good as casino royale,not as much depth to the plot,and it is quite slick,and moves very fast....it does follow on from casino royale,so i would watch that first,if i hadnt already....:)
 

Barney Rubble

Well-known member
Car chase - Foot chase - Boat chase - Plane chase - Foot chase - Car chase - Foot chase - Boom.
You can't deny that every single action scene was top-notch, though. Plus there were some moments of real cinematic brilliance - the opera scene springs to mind.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Going to see it on Friday at this stage. I never saw Casino Royale. Should I watch it before to get this movie or does it not matter?
Not imperative, but I'd recommend it tho. QofS basically follows on from where Casino Royale left off.

Almost every review I've read says it owes a lot to the Bourne films; I've never seen any of them, but am probably going to give them a go now.

Hope the Craig films don't now follow the Brosnan route of great debut, not-so-very-great follow up & crap thereafter tho, because QofS fits that pattern.
 

Matteh

Well-known member
It clearly is imperative to watch Casino Royale. So many hark backs to the last one, re-introducing a character from the last one, you'd miss out on so much plotwise without seeing the last one.
 
Top