Assume you can only be talking about Cahill's tackle now, unless you think a highly debateable collision is a penalty to Japan?Shounak said:He would most likely have saved that goal had he not been knocked over.. He really wasn't that far from it..
That was worthy of a penalty..
Debatable? Are you kidding? It was a complete farce.marc71178 said:Assume you can only be talking about Cahill's tackle now, unless you think a highly debateable collision is a penalty to Japan?
He wasn't without blame with regards to the goal going in, he could have handled it a lot better for sure. However, he was definately fouled, as you can see in the image, and if you happen to see a replay of it, he was obviously obstructed by someone who was nowhere near the ball. Keeper fouled in an obvious manner = no goal, whether the keeper made an error or not.marc71178 said:Not the way the pundits over here saw it - every replay made them say it was less and less certain and that Schwarzer wasn't without blame.
Just saw it (I was at work so just saw highlights).FaaipDeOiad said:Debatable? Are you kidding? It was a complete farce.