(2)
- Most of my arguments had kind of evolved into talking points to which anarchy was the natural conclusion. If you believe in self-ownership, property rights, subjective value etc it becomes very hard to argue that it should be okay for the government to steal small amounts of money.. and without tax, threats and force, government institutions cease to exist, or at the very least just change into non-government.
- Essentially what you just said. Sustained anarchy may a bit unrealistic in some ways, but I became sadly convinced that sustained small government is even moreso. If you have a small government based on anything people have devised so far -- constitutional democracy, monarchy, direct democracy, whatever -- the incentives involved will always propel it to grow. I think the only way to avoid big government is to get rid of it altogether. It may be so that getting rid of it will have to involve shrinking it first, but if we don't kill it from there it'll just grow again.