• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best New Labour Prime Minister

Best New Labour PM?


  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
One bombed the **** out of Iraq and made great legislative strides in the never ending battle against individual liberty
One was in number eleven laying the foundations for the economic ruin he presided over as premier before dithering his way through a two year spell
One wants to read your WhatsApp messages and make being mean to politicians a crime


Tough call.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Blair and Brown, for all their flaws, are still miles better than the rabble that preceded them and the rabble that's been in government for the last 8 years.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
And before you start. I consider the Falklands fair game. Gulf War, Libya, terrible but not on the level of Iraq.

**** Tony Blair
 

Bijed

Well-known member
In terms of just their tenure as PM, so discounting anything they did in other ministerial roles, has to be Brown, surely?

Not that you'd say he was a good PM, but > Blair anyway (low bar, admittedly)

I mean, I generally like to think of myself as someone who refrains from making outright rude remarks about people, but Blair was an absolute ****. **** him.
 
Last edited:

_Ed_

Well-known member
Yeah I loved the Iraq War too
And before you start. I consider the Falklands fair game. Gulf War, Libya, terrible but not on the level of Iraq.

**** Tony Blair
It was unforgivable, and IMO quite rightly casts a massive shadow over his legacy. But would it have been any different if the Conservatives were in power? Seem to remember Iain Duncan Smith being very pro-invasion.
 

Niall

Well-known member
It was unforgivable, and IMO quite rightly casts a massive shadow over his legacy. But would it have been any different if the Conservatives were in power? Seem to remember Iain Duncan Smith being very pro-invasion.
IDS was a bit of a hawk iirc. Who knows what would have happened if Kenneth Clarke had won the leadership for the tories as he was obviously less awful and against the war.

Blair did some good things, but when you consider the amount of deaths that it caused and the generations it radicalised, he can't ever be forgiven.
 

Uppercut

Well-known member
So it’s obviously Brown. GFC had pretty much nothing to do with him (clue’s in the name). And he didn’t invade anyone.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
It was unforgivable, and IMO quite rightly casts a massive shadow over his legacy. But would it have been any different if the Conservatives were in power? Seem to remember Iain Duncan Smith being very pro-invasion.
Oh aye, there were plenty of people on either side of the house who would have backed it. A lot of the support was based on the WMD stuff though. As PM, Blair has to bear responsibility for that IMO
 

Uppercut

Well-known member
Oh aye, there were plenty of people on either side of the house who would have backed it. A lot of the support was based on the WMD stuff though. As PM, Blair has to bear responsibility for that IMO
Yeah, there's a difference between "did Bad Thing" and "would almost definitely also have done Bad Thing".

But it is interesting that Blair only ever erred on the side of being too right-wing. The wars, authoritarianism, financial deregulation (YMMV), PFIs/PPPs (though those were moreso Brown) were all stolen from or heavily backed by the Tories. Harder to think of a time when he was too left-wing- I guess you would have to say immigration given the political economy effects, but all of his stuff on homelessness, minimum wage, child poverty was successful on its own terms. Very much frustrated younger-me that the population reacted by replacing him with a more right-wing government.
 

Niall

Well-known member
Pretty sure Gove and Big Dave were also big fans of Tony which tells you enough right there.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
So it’s obviously Brown. GFC had pretty much nothing to do with him (clue’s in the name). And he didn’t invade anyone.
Arguably Brown and Darling were responsible for lessening the impact of the GFC.

We were recovering OK until that **** Osborne crashed the economy.
 

Uppercut

Well-known member
I think Brown handled it well, at least in the immediate aftermath. Sort of subjective though.

He did bang on a lot about how we’d moved past ‘the old boom and bust’. And by all reports he was temperamentally not suited to the job at all. But we’re only comparing him to other PMs so it’s a pretty low bar.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Yeah, there's a difference between "did Bad Thing" and "would almost definitely also have done Bad Thing".

But it is interesting that Blair only ever erred on the side of being too right-wing. The wars, authoritarianism, financial deregulation (YMMV), PFIs/PPPs (though those were moreso Brown) were all stolen from or heavily backed by the Tories. Harder to think of a time when he was too left-wing- I guess you would have to say immigration given the political economy effects, but all of his stuff on homelessness, minimum wage, child poverty was successful on its own terms. Very much frustrated younger-me that the population reacted by replacing him with a more right-wing government.
Authoritarianism is not really a right wing trait, in my book anyway. But that was, after the wars, his worst trait.

Without getting into a debate about his ‘left wing’ measures, what option was there other than a move to the right? Governments just reach an end sometimes and it doesn’t matter whose fault it is, when the country is on its arse and a party has had over a decade of power then that time arrives.
 

Uppercut

Well-known member
Could’ve gone with the Lib Dems, they opposed both the war and the authoritarianism. They did sort of get elected in 2010 but didn’t increase their vote share much. I do see your point though.
 

S.Kennedy

Well-known member
Brown's tenure was rather forgettable, like an interregnum between Blair and the return of the Tories. Everyone thought he would be a socialist bruiser but he was completely ineffectual and gaffe prone.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah, there's a difference between "did Bad Thing" and "would almost definitely also have done Bad Thing".

But it is interesting that Blair only ever erred on the side of being too right-wing. The wars, authoritarianism, financial deregulation (YMMV), PFIs/PPPs (though those were moreso Brown) were all stolen from or heavily backed by the Tories. Harder to think of a time when he was too left-wing- I guess you would have to say immigration given the political economy effects, but all of his stuff on homelessness, minimum wage, child poverty was successful on its own terms. Very much frustrated younger-me that the population reacted by replacing him with a more right-wing government.
Probably the broader population cares less about surface level ideology and "spectral" politics and more about stuff that seems non-ideological or non-partisan like competence. So for a lot of people, it's not so much that they prefer the other lot's ideology is that they feel the other lot should have a go.
 
Top