Looks like we can get responses from the fantasy staff here, which is great! (I just thought to check out this part of the forum, having followed other parts, and playing fantasy on the cricketweb site for 6-8 months now.)
So, my question: All rounders are placed as either bowlers or batsmen, and to me at least it often seems random which slot they are put into. At least, some whom I consider more important for batting or bowling are found in the opposite category. Why can't they be listed in both places, so you can increase the strategy by letting folks choose which category they want to slot them into. Of course, it doesn't matter for scoring, since all actions are scored for all players. But it does matter for making the best use of your batting and bowling slots, depending on who is playing.
(I could have made a new thread, but this seems to follow on well to the question about players not playing keeper being on the keeper list. Which reminds me, why not allow keepers to also be on the batsmen lists (but not vice-versa, because you shouldn't be able to put a non-keeper in the keeper slot)? )