Yeah, and they need to make those changes, yes.
But the economics of this situation goes this way:
a) Greece doesn't have its own currency and its own central bank
b) The entire continent just went through a massive recession, which the countries haven't recovered from (especially when it comes to the unemployment rate)
c) This is much more a demand side recession than a supply sided one
d) In such recessions, the key is to get demand back up
e) For the first few years, ECB sucked balls on this. They refused to even have the required monetary stimulus. In fact, they raised rates at one point! Fathom this. Greece, being part of the Euro, had to go through this. US and UK didn't.
f) Greece did start with a higher debt burden than the other EU members, yes. But a 100% debt-GDP ratio isn't insane. It can be reined in without too much hardship
g) One of the worst times to cut government spending is during a demand deficient recession
h) Even if you do cut govt spending, normal countries will have central banks who will offset that austerity by expanding money supply, conducting QE etc. This is very important. Greece does not have a central banl, again.
h) The Greece rescue plan should have included no short term austerity measures, but firm austerity measures when growth and normalcy returned
i) Their GDP has tanked since the austerity program
j) You would assume that the only (one and only) benefit of the austerity program would be to reduce the debt/GDP ratio. But because the GDP has tanked so much (because of austerity itself!), the debt-GDP ratio is actually higher now!
And all of this was very predictable economics. Basically Irving Fisher from the 1930s. Everyone knows this. Not having your own central bank, but one which listens to the Troika is deeply damaging sometimes, and the Troika takes no responsibility for that. They think they are doing a swell job!
More on this in a while. Have to go.