• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ponting's Ashes XI

Zinzan

Well-known member
Thoughts on Punter's dream Ashes team selected from players he played with or against?
Features | Ponting's Ashes XI | ESPN Cricinfo

The XI

Hayden
Cook
Langer
Pietersen
S Waugh
M Hussey
Gilchrist
Flintoff
Gillespie
Warne
McGrath


Fairly predictable, although interesting he went for Langer in his own no. 3 slot. Also was surprised he opted for Gillespie ahead of Anderson. His rationale seemed to be based on Dizzy's value as a lower order batsman, which I thought a touch strange.
 

Howe_zat

Well-known member
Anderson hasn't had the best time of it vs Ponting tbf, 2010-11 being the exception.

Would have been a bit much to pick himself :p
 

TNT

Banned
Thoughts on Punter's dream Ashes team selected from players he played with or against?



Fairly predictable, although interesting he went for Langer in his own no. 3 slot. Also was surprised he opted for Gillespie ahead of Anderson. His rationale seemed to be based on Dizzy's value as a lower order batsman, which I thought a touch strange.
That's a no brainer really.
 

Jnr.

Well-known member
Surprised Michael Vaughan wasn't in at three, with Langer and Hayden to open.
 

Zinzan

Well-known member
That's a no brainer really.

Anderson hasn't had the best time of it vs Ponting tbf, 2010-11 being the exception.
In Ponting's Ashes career, mid '97 to end of 2010; Anderson has 34 wickets @ 42, so yeah, was reading too much into that 10/11 series. Gillespie 61 wickets @ 29 is probably about right, although Stuart Clark's 30 wickets @ 20 is pretty damn impressive.

Would have been a bit much to pick himself :p
Yeah, I meant we know it's his spot. Btw, Trott did play just play the 5 tests and averaged >100 in Ponting's time, but Langer probably is the 2nd choice.
 

harsh.ag

Well-known member
We don't know that he did. He could rank Langer the higher of the two, but think he's a better fit for no. 3 in the side.
Yeah could be. Seemed weird that he would break the Hayden-Langer partnership otherwise though. Someone like Clarke or Vaughan could be at 3.
 

flibbertyjibber

Well-known member
To be honest nobody could have argued had he had himself in and picked an entire team of Aussies. Flintoff would be the first English choice but a case could be made for Langer to open instead of Cook and an Aussie in place of KP and if he had gone for Lee over Flintoff to have his old attack who could argue given how good they were?
 

OverratedSanity

Well-known member
I knew McGrath liked Lord's but this still blew my mind:

Glenn McGrath has a bowling average of 11.50 at Lord's - the second-best for any bowler with more than 25 wickets at a single ground
And the rest of the list is mostly gujys from the 19th century.
 

OverratedSanity

Well-known member
To be honest nobody could have argued had he had himself in and picked an entire team of Aussies. Flintoff would be the first English choice but a case could be made for Langer to open instead of Cook and an Aussie in place of KP and if he had gone for Lee over Flintoff to have his old attack who could argue given how good they were?
Would have been pretty awesome if he'd just listed the entire 06-07 Australian XI
 
Top