[B]Lahore: Test Runs FC Runs Test Wkts FC Wkts[/B]
1. Imran Farhat 1655 @ 33.10 7979 @ 42.65 3 @ 72.66 90 @ 29.30
2. Imran Nazir 427 @ 32.84 4897 @ 32.43 - 5 @ 53.80
3. Naved Latif 20 @ 10.00 6862 @ 35.73 - 34 @ 34.94
4. Mohammad Yousuf 6770 @ 55.49 9354 @ 51.39 - -
5. Inzamam-ul-Haq 8830 @ 49.30 16785 @ 50.10 - 38 @ 34.07
6. Azhar Mahmood 900 @ 30.00 6557 @ 31.98 39 @ 35.94 515 @ 25.33
7. Khalid Mahmood+ - 3316 @ 27.40 - -
8. Rana Naved 239 @ 19.91 3058 @ 22.65 18 @ 58.00 470 @ 24.16
9. Mohammad Sami 458 @ 12.05 1326 @ 14.73 81 @ 51.37 317 @ 31.76
10. Saqlain Mushtaq 927 @ 14.48 3405 @ 16.69 208 @ 29.83 833 @ 23.56
11. Shahid Nazir 194 @ 12.12 1509 @ 12.57 36 @ 35.33 434 @ 20.96
12. Arshad Khan 31 @ 5.16 2553 @ 12.89 32 @ 30.00 576 @ 23.85
Pakistan: Test Runs FC Runs Test Wkts FC Wkts
1. Salman Butt 1047 @ 29.08 4724 @ 42.55 1 @ 95.00 11 @ 57.72
2. Khurram Manzoor - 2769 @ 40.72 - 1 @ 62.00
3. Younis Khan 4816 @ 49.14 9685 @ 50.44 2 @ 101.50 20 @ 54.55
4. Misbah-ul-Haq 671 @ 41.93 9843 @ 51.53 - 3 @ 80.66
5. Shoaib Malik 1076 @ 35.86 3022 @ 28.24 13 @ 67.00 163 @ 30.60
6. Faisal Iqbal 897 @ 25.62 7203 @ 39.14` - 1 @ 98.00
7. Kamran Akmal+ 1944 @ 31.86 5582 @ 31.53 - -
8. Yasir Arafat 44 @ 22.00 5185 @ 27.43 7 @ 30.00 580 @ 23.78
9. Shoaib Akhtar 544 @ 10.07 1638 @ 12.12 178 @ 25.69 460 @ 26.53
10. Umar Gul 136 @ 7.55 445 @ 11.12 67 @ 31.55 197 @ 24.98
11. Danish Kaneria 260 @ 6.84 1090 @ 10.18 220 @ 33.80 681 @ 26.64
12. Abdur Rehman 34 @ 17.00 1614 @ 17.73 11 @ 32.00 248 @ 27.73
So Inzi and Yousuf and going to take twenty wickets between them every game?weakest link from both teams
badasha
sami, navid, shahid nazir
pakistan
kanaria, Faisal iqbal, Kamran Akmal
i would go would Badashah's simply cuz of yousuf and inzi.. unfortunatly none of pakistan's batsman are in the same leaguge as any of these two players. if Inzi and yousuf play to thier full potential they could simply clean sweep 5 matches series to 5-0
i didn't mean that. but what i meant was that they could make enough runs that Badshahs could defind it Despite having sami and rana there.. saqalin and Mahmood are decent bowlers.. i would pick them over Kanaria and Yasir Arafat any day..So Inzi and Yousuf and going to take twenty wickets between them every game?
You definitely need your bowling to fire if want to win a series 5-0. You can win it to nil without your bowlers really hitting their straps with a couple of draws in there, but you aren't going to win every match just based on two good batsmen.
I really think that Malik, Misbah and Younis not to amntion Salman Butt would dominate the Badshahs's bowling enough to negate any damage Inzi and Youssuf could do. never mind that Pakistan still have a stronger lineup.i didn't mean that. but what i meant was that they could make enough runs that Badshahs could defind it Despite having sami and rana there.. saqalin and Mahmood are decent bowlers.. i would pick them over Kanaria and Yasir Arafat any day..
Pakistanwho'd win?
India offer a good example of thisPakistan
- ALWAYS in Tests
- Almost Always in ODI's
- Most of the times in T20.
The chances of the lesser teams winning increases as the game becomes shorter.
I need to put that in my sig. I can't believe no one in the audience (the five people that were there) carried signs with that quote during the Indian Tests and after the CB series.India offer a good example of this
When since you started stealing Ponting's words?India offer a good example of this
Thank your lucky stars you're not an ex-player, or I'd have had to attack you for your less than angelic accusation of me!When since you started stealing Ponting's words?
Thank your lucky stars you're not an ex-player, or I'd have had to attack you for your less than angelic accusation of me!