This is exactly opposite to the logic I took for Sanga. I figured he dominated so many series that he must have had a lot of really poor ones, and these would count against him more because of the scoring system using negative points. And here we are with him smack in the middle.Interesting results. I thought Tendulkar would have the lowest standard deviation (he was generally always good for a century every series) but I expected Kallis and Sangakkara to be ahead overall because they had a few series where they completely dominated.
Lara. Legend. Much flashier than the others and he did what he did against the best of the best while carrying multiple nations on his shoulders.AB. LEGEND. Not as flashy is the others but he did what he did against the best of the best while carrying a nation on his shoulders.
Sure.Congratulations for your effort. Can you do the same for modern fab 4?
Nah, I said Sachin (2.2121) not Virat.Surprising that one series would make such a big difference, seems like a considerable gap between 2.25 and 1.95.
4Do Bradman.
1.4286now do voges
3.9091Do Bradman.
Yes it is possible, might take a look later but definitely think DoGs bowling list is worth finishing first.Is a bowler version of this possible?
No worries. Ive already worked out the first 3 but dont have the data on me. ill do the 2 current players tonight.Thanks. One last request for these players.
Sehwag, Hayden, Miachel clarke, Pujara and Warner
Great to see younis break the top 5. Perenially under rated.So the top 20 leading runscorers are now ranked.
2.2121 - SR TENDULKAR
2.0571 - BC LARA
2.0000 - AB DE VILLIERS
1.9487 - AR BORDER
1.9318 - YOUNIS KHAN
1.9286 - R DRAVID
1.9259 - KC SANGAKKARA
1.8983 - JH KALLIS
1.8333 - INZAMAM-UL-HAQ
1.7742 - SM GAVASKAR
1.7193 - S CHANDERPAUL
1.7069 - DPMD JAYAWARDENE
1.6981 - RT PONTING
1.6579 - JAVED MIANDAD
1.6170 - SR WAUGH
1.5581 - GC SMITH
1.4884 - HM AMLA
1.4681 - AN COOK
1.3333 - GA GOOCH
1.3256 - VVS LAXMAN
Kind of fitting/annoying that de Villiers and Border are right near each other.