The thing is he doesn't ever tend to bat the 30+ over innings, so by opening with him, he takes time to settle in and most of the field restrictions are then in effect slightly underutilised.Mister Wright said:Pietersen would be a good option IMO. The more overs he is out there the better.
It's worth a try though IMO, at least in something like the Champions Trophy, especially considering they play a game against Australia. If it doesn't work they can try a different option for the VB series.marc71178 said:The thing is he doesn't ever tend to bat the 30+ over innings, so by opening with him, he takes time to settle in and most of the field restrictions are then in effect slightly underutilised.
Far better to have him come in in the middle order for me, so he can set himself up to tee off in the last 10-15 overs.
You were the one who came up with the 'eleven batters' idea.Neil Pickup said:Ah, crap. We've got to the stage where we're using Pitt's ideas. Not good.
Don't worry. It won't. You won't.Barney Rubble said:You were the one who came up with the 'eleven batters' idea.
And if this works, I expect to be hailed as a genius.
Take that back!Tim said:Interesting...England are still clearly a little clueless when it comes to their best ODI side right now.
steds said:Don't worry. It won't. You won't.
That's if his mind lets him play.marc71178 said:To be fair, the role being looked at is more likely the one Trescothick will be playing in the World Cup IMO.