I'm pretty easy, really. Given we've already had 6 knock-out games without the rule tho it might be easier to stick with what we've got! I'm happy to bow to the majority either way.I play similar games in other forums. In one forum we have a rule which I would like to discuss with you.
Knockout matches cannot end in a draw. If the scores are levelled after 80 minutes, there are the extra times. In our games, whenever a match goes into OT, it is always considered a 1-point game, regardless of the final score. Example:
After regulation, France and Argentina have both scored 20 points. In the OT, France score 20 points, while Argentina just 3, so the official score is 40-23 for France. However, for the matter of our game, the final score is 21-20 for France: France have won for 1 point not for 17. I think this is a fair rule.
Then: what about tries? I also think that we should only consider regulation and not extra time.
What do you think?
Which will be scored along the same lines as the tries:Seeing as there are only 2 games this round, and to make it a little harder again, any chance of adding something to do with Penalty Goals in there?
So for the final all scores are worth double, you can do the maths yourselves. As no-one has voiced opinion on Stefano's idea, I'll be taking into account the margin after extra-time should it be played & penalties kicked and tries scored in extra time also count towards the totals.Dale - the final to be worth double points?
You might want a rethink. Traille ruled out.Friday, 19 October 2007
France v Argentina -- France by 10
3 tries
Traille
6 penalties
Thanks, Mate!You might want a rethink. Traille ruled out.