GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
I’d say it’s an excess rather than abundanceWhat's actually out of control is abundance of political discourse turned into arguments about semantics.
I’d say it’s an excess rather than abundanceWhat's actually out of control is abundance of political discourse turned into arguments about semantics.
Yeah, sounds like Dharmasena's definition of adjacentDoesn't sound adjacent at all to me.
Eh? How so? It's never been any different, and you'd expect nothing less in a political thread in which people passionately come from different viewpoints.The American Politics Thread is out of control tbh
What's actually out of control is abundance of political discourse turned into arguments about semantics.
Well from what I can tell that does away with most of what I've read just latelyEh? How so? It's never been any different, and you'd expect nothing less in a political thread in which people passionately come from different viewpoints.
I mean how boring would it be if everyone agreed with one another on everything.
Personally I like that thread more now than in 2016, a time when it felt like 99% were on one side of the political fence on close to all issues. I feel now people have matured in their views and have become more nuanced on individual issues (save those who equate less-than-ideal immigration policy to Nazi Germany and who cite everything as racism etc), and have moved away from that ghastly identity politics of 2016. I'm talking members on this forum in the main, and not the US political environment which has moved even more towards identity politics on the left.
What could possibly be more "identity politics" than saying to people "go back to where you came from"?Eh? How so? It's never been any different, and you'd expect nothing less in a political thread in which people passionately come from different viewpoints.
I mean how boring would it be if everyone agreed with one another on everything.
Personally I like that thread more now than in 2016, a time when it felt like 99% were on one side of the political fence on close to all issues. I feel now people have matured in their views and have become more nuanced on individual issues (save those who equate less-than-ideal immigration policy to Nazi Germany and who cite everything as racism etc), and have moved away from that ghastly identity politics of 2016. I'm talking members on this forum in the main, and not the US political environment which has moved even more towards identity politics on the left.
You misread, I was referring to CW chatters on the american politics thread becoming more nuanced on individual issues, and less about identity politics now vs. 2016.What could possibly be more "identity politics" than saying to people "go back to where you came from"?
The seats Trump turned red were not won on identity politicsIt's especially funny since 2016 was basically decided by identity politics and will probably decide 2020 as well.
Would be valid except non-white working-class vote didn't break for Trump. He specifically appealed to white people by going hard on immigration and minorities. It's true that "economic anxiety" was a factor, but it's not the main one.My point is that they wanted economic improvement, and Trump promised it, I'd say that's what got their vote rather than this vague appeal to identity as you say.
This is more correct than you think.Everything is identity politics then, no?
This is basically the argument that many on the left - most promimently Coates - have been making for a while nowEverything is identity politics then, no?
TBH I haven't got that impression from Coates.This is basically the argument that many on the left - most promimently Coates - have been making for a while now