Which would be fine if not for the fact that losing government will inevitably result in something they'd hate even more than they hate the NEG.Possibly. Sounds like there’s a few backbenchers who would rather lose government than vote for the Neg.
Well of course it was. Anning himself straight out said that wasn't the connection he was making but people who are looking for dog-whistles will find them.Annings speech was evidently taken out of context by sections of the media according to Bolt.
Haha his speech-writer knew exactly what he was doing. I've met the guy, trust me.Well of course it was. Anning himself straight out said that wasn't the connection he was making but people who are looking for dog-whistles will find them.
I remember Queensland as it was in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, when working blokes could get good, well-paying jobs actually making products for us to buy; when people could start small businesses and not be strangled by red tape; when car rego, stamp duty and rates were affordable; when electricity was the cheapest in the world; when, through statutory and orderly marketing, farmers were not bled white by rapacious corporations or forced to sell to Chinese carpetbaggers; when you could say what you thought without being charged with a crime; and when we could all enjoy our leisure time without all the nanny state restrictions and prohibitions.
You think he's racist? Or are you saying he just did it for attention?Haha his speech-writer knew exactly what he was doing. I've met the guy, trust me.
The media have played right into their hands though.
I liked his memory of Queensland during Joh's reign...
For mine Richard Howard clearly wrote the speech (or at the very least, that part of it). I've met him a couple of times and at heart he's just a troll. He absolutely thinks saying completely out of bounds stuff is the best tactic for micro-right parliamentarians, especially if they can find a way to give the words they use a double-meaning. "Final solution" really was just a completely textbook Richard Howard troll.You think he's racist? Or are you saying he just did it for attention?
Yeah I guess if I were to lay out my opinions to the relevant questions, it'd be:He said on 3AW that Australian-born Muslims with no other citizenship should still be deported (to "Muslimland" presumably) if they commit any crimes, so, yeah...
He's more anti-Muslim than he is anti-white I think.I don't think it's even anti-Muslim per se, it's flat out anyone who isn't white (he went after Asians and Africans too - notwithstanding the fact that I'm pretty sure a big proportion of the African migrants we take in are Christians, and certainly more Christian than the median Australian these days)
Haha is this actually true? Considering that in theory his target demo is rural North Queenslanders.He's more anti-Muslim than he is anti-white I think.
He wants to deport all Muslims; he just doesn't want to let any new non-whites in.
He wouldn't dare suggest Asians should be deported because 30% of his target voting demographic have Asian wives.
I was making a joke about the Australian "white supremacist" men I encounter on the internet. But it wouldn't surprise me if they actually factored that in, tbh.Haha is this actually true? Considering that in theory his target demo is rural North Queenslanders.
Or they're incredibly thick.Their estimation is probably that they'll lose anyway, and climate policy is so inherently toxic that it'd be best long-term if they weren't responsible for it.