• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The British Politics Thread

Uppercut

Well-known member
Don't think that they will get the freedom of movement opt-outs. It is too important to the tenets of the EU. And money is not enough anymore maybe 30/40 years ago it could have worked. We shall see.
The question is never "is money enough?", it's always "how much money is enough?"
 

StephenZA

Well-known member
The question is never "is money enough?", it's always "how much money is enough?"
Thing is they will have to create special rules to overcome a pretty big basis of the EU, which would then create precedent which can effect the basic rules and laws of the EU. Which as you say may be overcome with enough money but that is gonna be a hella'vu lot of money to make the EU rewrite one of their cardinal rules. Not even Norway could afford it.
 

fredfertang

Well-known member
Thing is they will have to create special rules to overcome a pretty big basis of the EU, which would then create precedent which can effect the basic rules and laws of the EU. Which as you say may be overcome with enough money but that is gonna be a hella'vu lot of money to make the EU rewrite one of their cardinal rules. Not even Norway could afford it.
Which I suspect will be the point at which whoever is then PM (it may even be the not so wicked but certainly more stupid witch) will decide that, blaming Cameron of course, perhaps we do need a second referendum after all
 

StephenZA

Well-known member
Which I suspect will be the point at which whoever is then PM (it may even be the not so wicked but certainly more stupid witch) will decide that, blaming Cameron of course, perhaps we do need a second referendum after all
Which may be to far down the line... pulling out from Brexit now may still be acceptable, in 18 months I don't see the EU at least demanding many concessions anyway. And even if there is a 2nd referendum and UK remains in the EU it will still probably be close and 1/2 the country will still be unhappy....

For me UK is over a barrel and either gives many concessions to EU to try remain without remaining during negotiations, or else cuts its losses and tries to make the best of the circumstances and hopefully recover and rebuild over time.... all of it is going to hurt short term both socially and economically; Which is the better long term option, who really knows.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Agree, but then the newly elected Labour MP who did front up came over appallingly badly - the interview I saw with her just consisted of her making a few political points - I hope that was just misleading editing, and that in reality she did show some humanity and thought for all of the victims
She sounded angry as hell in the Graun piece just run. So, one way or the other, the power of the editor's pen...
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Meanwhile Corbyn calls for private property (albeit empty) to be seized so he can give it to victims of the fire

He'd never use tragedy to push his personal agenda mind you
 

fredfertang

Well-known member
Being held responsible and accountable for tragedies like this is one of the things that goes with a career in politics and, quite rightly, the colour of the party flag is irrelevant
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Being held responsible and accountable for tragedies like this is one of the things that goes with a career in politics and, quite rightly, the colour of the party flag is irrelevant
Wasn't referring to the accountability Fred. I'm purely talking about him pushing his socialist agenda by saying property should be seized.
 

wpdavid

Well-known member
Wasn't referring to the accountability Fred. I'm purely talking about him pushing his socialist agenda by saying property should be seized.
I think you're being harsh mate. From here, it just reads like a suggestion to provide a short-term solution to a specific situation, rather than pushing 'all property is theft' socialism.

And to provide balance, I think some of the criticism of May's performance yesterday is unwarranted too.
 

Uppercut

Well-known member
Is it just my bubble or is blame for the fire really sticking to May and the Tories? She was already looking like an arse over the failed election and DUP stuff. Then a desperately poor building in the richest area of the country burns down and May won't meet its residents, and now I'm getting a lot of Cameron's old anti-health+safety speeches, Barwell's delaying of new fire regulations, Boris's cuts to fire services, reports that tenants tried to go to court but couldn't get legal aid. etc.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Is it just my bubble or is blame for the fire really sticking to May and the Tories? She was already looking like an arse over the failed election and DUP stuff. Then a desperately poor building in the richest area of the country burns down and May won't meet its residents, and now I'm getting a lot of Cameron's old anti-health+safety speeches, Barwell's delaying of new fire regulations, Boris's cuts to fire services, reports that tenants tried to go to court but couldn't get legal aid. etc.
It's impossible to say but they're doing their level best to make it stick, you'd have to say. It's kind of unreal how bad May is at this whole PM thing.
 

fredfertang

Well-known member
The Tories are on a hiding to nothing on this one irrespective of where the blame truly lies, but what amazes me is the lack of any sort of statesmanship being demonstrated by any of them - Sadiq Khan was truly awful when he was interviewed by the Beeb this morning - never much cared for the bloke but Cameron would have dealt with this one immeasurably better than May has
 

Spark

Global Moderator
The Tories are on a hiding to nothing on this one irrespective of where the blame truly lies, but what amazes me is the lack of any sort of statesmanship being demonstrated by any of them - Sadiq Khan was truly awful when he was interviewed by the Beeb this morning - never much cared for the bloke but Cameron would have dealt with this one immeasurably better than May has
Cameron was always good at this sort of thing whenever I checked tbf.

But yeah, Sadiq Khan hasn't done well either. Nor has Boris Johnson just now. Corbyn has mostly done better by actually behaving like a vaguely normal person when he was on the scene.
 
Top