Teja.

o maramanishi maaa loki ra
o maramanishi maaa loki ra

inumutho silicon cherchi
teegalatho terepinchi
harddisk lo memory kurchi
chaniponi dheham tho
chadiponi pranam tho
aryogyanam nikai nerpithe vigynanam
nilipe prayatnam
o maramanishi maaa loki ra

neelo valapu anuvule yenani
neutron electron ne kannulona motham yenani
ninne thalisthe naraallo theepi aase regene
ayyoooo

Can't go past the draw at this stage. Boring answer, I know.

But if I can keep up my standards, I won't have question marks regarding the natural aesthetic bias hanging over my head. It's worth the risk IMO.

Have taken Ema out of my avatar to ensure my legacy is untainted.

Hahahahaha, gun!!

She is absolutely gorgeous though; it'll definitely create a large amount of bias I'm sure. It's human nature after all. :P

Haha, thanks. Feeling is definitely mutual.

You do have to keep telling yourself that I don't look like my avatar though. She knows nothing about cricket unfortunately.

Lol yeah true although ab's input wasn't that much greater than viv's. They were fav 80s batsman tbh

S Sreesanth 13 3 41 0

Don't know, tbh. I don't think he injured himself that severely tbh. Yuvraj needed surgery, Sreesanth didn't, as far as I know. And he seems to have made a quicker recovery too. I was sureprised to hear of his inclusion tbh.

Professional rehabilitation and training techniques ensure that (b) is more likely than (a). Think Yuvraj Singh and his knee brace. He simply isn't the same fielder he was after his cruciate ligament tear. If Sreesanth has had the same injury, he will either hold back in his run up, or give it his all and screw up his knee even further. I don't think it's been a long time since his injury, and he seems to be fit already, so I'm tending towards thinking and hoping the injury reports weren't entirely accurate. Fingers crossed.

If the reports that suggested that he did his cruciate ligament are true, then yes The cruciate ligaments are what hold the knee in place and stabilise it. Once you've torn them, they will heal back, but never to their original state. They'll either (a) shrink, and their structure changes from the original semi-elastic one to a taut unyielding one, which greatly reduces the range and ease of movement at the joint. OR (b) the injury could have stretched them, and ligaments never quite return back to their original shape and length. What that means is that they can no longer be relied on to hold the joint securely in place, and the muscles around the joint will have to be properly exercised and conditioned to perform that function instead. The muscles cannot be depended on to do that good a job, especially in as high impact an area as a fast bowlers landing leg knee joint, so the bowler will tend to be tentative and withhold testing the joint to its limits due to the instability.

Damn right!

Oh I didn't take any offence mate, as I said to andyc, I should have put some sort of smiley in there

Don't know much about rock albums...

man i am back from my ban.. wanted to say sorry once again.. no hard feelings

and good morning by the way

Haha, yeah. IMO bowling coaches in India shuold be outlawed. Let our guys learn their craft on their own like the Pakistanis probabyl do. The 83 WC win was probably the worst thing to happen to us. Suddenly we had the likes of Sandhu, Binny, Amarnath become role models in the 90's when they took up coaching. ****ing dibbly dobblers. The only reason I'm not totally jealous of Pakistan now is that they can't bat or catch to save their lives

Haha, yeah. Love how its been argued that its possible that poor innocent Randiv didn't bowl a deliberate no ball despite the footage. Then its claimed that the SLC must have pressurised him to apologise because he wouldn't have done it because he's too much of a prick to do a thing like that. Here's a newsflash for them conspiracy theorists - who's likely to bowl a deliberate no ball? That's right, a prick!!

No worries, its an understandable reaction.