• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Ireland in England 2019

Flem274*

123/5
what the hell happened after i fell asleep? leach and that jammy bloke who hid behind him were cruising/jammying to glory.
 

Burgey

Well-known member
It reminds me of Alex Tudor's match-winning 99* against New Zealand in 1999. iirc he batted at number 3 as a night-watchman and made what should have been a challenging chase look easy.
Shades of Eddie Hemmings’ 95 for the Poms vs Australia at Sydney in 83.
 

GotSpin

Well-known member
You can't really slag your team's test batting if they're dominating ODIs for the same reasons they're sucking at tests. It's the same personnel and the divergence between what makes a good one day batsman and a good test batsman is greater than ever. It's just about priorities and you could argue it has paid off. Every time Bairstow goes out to bat he can't switch modes on his muscle memory and temperament depending on format. Even Root's glorious ton in SL last year was a rapid fire knock. One day mode is going to get them 300 regardless of the format usually, with the odd 85 all out every now and then. I was really hoping for Burns to do well. Hope he comes good soon.
That’s a cop out. Justifying poor batting with ‘that’s just the way we play’ is so awful
 

Spintolose

Well-known member
Just watching the highlights of the part of the game I missed earlier.
Root! FFS! That was a shocker - the run out of Denly and his now infamous hoiking with a marshmallow bat.

No surprise King Pairstow used up the review. 😜

It's all good fun. I think the England batting coach likes a Guinness or 2 before work.
 

stephen

Well-known member
Genuinely happy for Leach. Seems like a decent bloke. Never expected him to ever score runs like that.

England's new test opener?
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Honestly watching Leach vs Burns, I was questioning which one is the batsman. Good luck to Rory, but he has zero upside as a Test player.

Day 3 is set up well. Id love to see Porterfield make a contribution.
 

TheJediBrah

Well-known member
That’s a cop out. Justifying poor batting with ‘that’s just the way we play’ is so awful
Yeah you can't say that. They're different forms of the game for a reason. It's like saying "it's ok that we batted out a T20 and made 0/30 because that's how we play in Tests". No you played a **** T20 if you did that.

Preparing for disappointment to be crushing.

That said a little sad Leach didn't get a ton.
There's something special about a nightwatchman making runs. Always a good time.
 
Last edited:

morgieb

Well-known member
Yeah the Leach innings was great fun.

England definite favourites but 190-odd is far from unchasable. Conditions probably not in Ireland's favour though sadly.
 

Burgey

Well-known member
I haven't watched a bll of this match thus far, but has the pitch settled down now into something easier to bat on? I see from the comments on here that the thinking seems to be a lot of the England second innings wickets had nothing really to do with the deck. Is that fair comment, because if it's flattened out that much and Ireland knock ove r the last wicket to chase around 200, they're only one decent partnership from winning. Should be a thrilling denouement.
 

zorax

likes this
So basically only the golden era Aussies ever have well and truly mastered the modern game across formats (not counting T20s because those came to prominence after the gang disbanded).

That's a good point though. England finally have the WC. Fans ought to go a little easy on their Test failures in the immediate future.
Pitches were flatter back when the Aussies were dominating, plus their dominance was built around their bowlers. Their batting did look a bit different between formats too - Langer being a test specialist, Symonds and Bevan mostly playing ODIs, Gilly shifting between opening and batting 7, M Waugh shifting between opening and batting in the middle. S Waugh played on as a Test specialist for a while.
 

FBU

Well-known member
Just watching the highlights of the part of the game I missed earlier.
Root! FFS! That was a shocker - the run out of Denly and his now infamous hoiking with a marshmallow bat.

No surprise King Pairstow used up the review. ��

It's all good fun. I think the England batting coach likes a Guinness or 2 before work.
Root told Bairstow to review it, just after he had run out Denly. Also dropped a catch in the slips off Broad. I have no faith in Root as captain.
 

social

Well-known member
I haven't watched a bll of this match thus far, but has the pitch settled down now into something easier to bat on? I see from the comments on here that the thinking seems to be a lot of the England second innings wickets had nothing really to do with the deck. Is that fair comment, because if it's flattened out that much and Ireland knock ove r the last wicket to chase around 200, they're only one decent partnership from winning. Should be a thrilling denouement.
Batting on the first morning was difficult but not impossible

As is generally the case when test teams are knocked over cheaply, England’s low score was caused by some good bowling and woeful batting

The pitch is good enough for a number 11 batsman averaging something like 5 recently to score 92
 
Top