• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

19th Match - England v West Indies

Who will win the match?


  • Total voters
    11

91Jmay

Well-known member
I think this attack can cause some damage against most of the teams from the sub-continent but I don't feel it will get us a semi-final spot, especially with the rain spreading some points around. Even against Australia, they blew away the top order and then the lack of variety and a couple of dropped catches meant they recovered. The batting is lacking a little bit of game-time for the likes of Pooran and Hetmeyer to help them make smart decision at key moments and the bowling lacks a decent spinner to help with those key breakthroughs when the tall bowlers aren't getting it done or are tiring.

It feels like we're close to being a formidable ODI side but aren't there in time for this competition. Whereas England have held this side together for a long time and it feels like they have both the decision making and the variety to win this.
Losing that Aus game was absolutely criminal. So many big moments thrown away.
 

Beamer

Well-known member
Bravo is pretty sub ideal but he'd contribute more than all these sloggers IMO. Put him at four and give the side a bit of backbone.
Not picking Ambris was a massive clanger tbh. He's got everything in his game to be an excellent ODI batsman and has made a super start to his limited overs international career.
 

MW1304

Well-known member
Such a dumb shot, literally no need to do anything like that. Bairstow gets himself out when set as much as any batsmen going around in this format, throws away so many big scores.
His conversion rate is fine tbh. More of a problem for him in Tests.
 

Beamer

Well-known member
This format is punishing for the lesser teams. Very hard to sustain excellence over nine games of 50 over cricket if you're a slap-dash, YOLO type of team.
Yeah you need some substance to get through the tough moments and allow the big hitters to do maximum damage. We're definitely one short in that regard.
 

91Jmay

Well-known member
His conversion rate is fine tbh. More of a problem for him in Tests.
Yeah that's probably true.

Great start from Chrissy boy. I might have given Stokes some time in the middle though, did well in the first game but hasn't scored a load of runs recently.
 

BSM

Well-known member
I think this attack can cause some damage against most of the teams from the sub-continent but I don't feel it will get us a semi-final spot, especially with the rain spreading some points around. Even against Australia, they blew away the top order and then the lack of variety and a couple of dropped catches meant they recovered. The batting is lacking a little bit of game-time for the likes of Pooran and Hetmeyer to help them make smart decision at key moments and the bowling lacks a decent spinner to help with those key breakthroughs when the tall bowlers aren't getting it done or are tiring.

It feels like we're close to being a formidable ODI side but aren't there in time for this competition. Whereas England have held this side together for a long time and it feels like they have both the decision making and the variety to win this.
Yeah I also think the Windies batting lineup is also at roughly the same (or similar) stage as England in late 2015/2016. The pieces there to develop into a great outfit but not yet experienced/developed enough and hence prone to many poor days. Unfortunately whereas we've had roughly a whole 4 years cycle to prepare, I think Windies development has been too quick to make them a stable unit at this tournament
 

mr_mister

Well-known member
Should Alzarri Joseph have made the cut over one of Thomas/Cottrell? Seems like a NCN/Richardson over Hazelwood scenario. Choose the apparent ODI 'specialists' at the expense of the superior bowler who could probably have adapted his game easy enough
 

BSM

Well-known member
Should Alzarri Joseph have made the cut over one of Thomas/Cottrell? Seems like a NCN/Richardson over Hazelwood scenario. Choose the apparent ODI 'specialists' at the expense of the superior bowler who could probably have adapted his game easy enough
Think he picked up a pretty bad injury in the IPL didn't he? Cottrell and Thomas have put in decent performances in ODIs before this tournament as well
 

Beamer

Well-known member
Yeah I also think the Windies batting lineup is also at roughly the same (or similar) stage as England in late 2015/2016. The pieces there to develop into a great outfit but not yet experienced/developed enough and hence prone to many poor days. Unfortunately whereas we've had roughly a whole 4 years cycle to prepare, I think Windies development has been too quick to make them a stable unit at this tournament
Yep agreed. Much of that is self-inflicted IMHO as our previous selectors went through a phase of real selection blunders and wasted valuable development time. We've also been needlessly holding Pooran back, he could be further on in his development. There is also the Rakheem Cornwall conundrum. It feels like we might sort this out but not in this tournament. Our only way into the semis is another God like run of form for Gayle or Hope, but I find it unlikely.

Should Alzarri Joseph have made the cut over one of Thomas/Cottrell? Seems like a NCN/Richardson over Hazelwood scenario. Choose the apparent ODI 'specialists' at the expense of the superior bowler who could probably have adapted his game easy enough
He would have been selected I think, but he got seriously injured in the IPL.
 

Cabinet96

Global Moderator
Didn't realise Brathwaite was nearly 31. Assumed he was young given Ian Bishop was telling us to remember the name after the 2016 World T20 final.
 

Beamer

Well-known member
Didn't realise Brathwaite was nearly 31. Assumed he was young given Ian Bishop was telling us to remember the name after the 2016 World T20 final.
He really is not worthy of a place in the side. Selecting him ahead of Keemo Paul is crazy on every level.
 

Beamer

Well-known member
Gayle throwing grenades.
In all seriousness this pitch has taken a bit of spin. Root caused trouble earlier and Gayle really doesn't look too bad.

Disappointed with the body language in this innings though. They gave up after around 15 overs I think. It's easy to be fired up when things are going your way, but it feels like they've thrown the towel in.
 
Top