• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**** Trotsky Said

Burgey

Well-known member
I assumed you were a nationalist for espousing the most nationalist antipodean nationalism imaginable the wrong side of Alan Border, and for being a communist, in this very conversation waxing lyrical on Leon Trotsky. My apologies olde boy.
I don’t follow how you concluded I’m a nationalist tbh. Accidents of birth shouldn’t give rise to some misplaced sense of pride in what is, after all, nothing more than a construct.
 

S.Kennedy

Well-known member
I don’t follow how you concluded I’m a nationalist tbh. Accidents of birth shouldn’t give rise to some misplaced sense of pride in what is, after all, nothing more than a construct.
Not a day goes by when you don't chastise somebody's country, usually either England or India (Chennai?), subjecting them to a torrent of xenophobic abuse whilst eulogising Australia in terms which would not be misplaced in 1930s Germany. Some of it is facetiousness and food related I'm sure, but...
 

Stapel

Well-known member
in an alternate universe a USSR lead by Trotsky probably would've lost WWII tbh
Ah, the joy of alternative universes, better known as "What ifs"

I'll radically overdo this one, by claiming that, if Trotski had lost WWII, our world today would not have problems caused by Putin. And the Middle East would be an ISIS-free paradise, as it's root cause, the existance of a Jewish State, would never have happened.

On a serious note: The only what-if I really like, Is Winston Churchill's one on the Battle of Getysburg.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I mean you could not possibly have done a better job of sabotaging the capabilities of the Red Army and inviting an attack than Stalin did right up to June 1941, and yet Germany never really came close to winning by most modern estimations
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
I mean you could not possibly have done a better job of sabotaging the capabilities of the Red Army and inviting an attack than Stalin did right up to June 1941, and yet Germany never really came close to winning by most modern estimations
You're also forgetting about the previous years, in which Stalin's ruthless and brutal regime managed to industrialise and modernise by sheer force a nation that was woefully behind the times.

it wasn't 'good', it wasn't 'right', but it was one of the contributing factors as to how they could churn out so many god damn tanks and airplanes.

Part of signing a pact with Germany in the first place was to delay what they knew was inevitable. They needed time to build up. The purges were stupid in terms of military leadership though, hence Finland.
 
Last edited:

andruid

Well-known member
Nah, reckon they'd have thrown the kitchen sink at defending Trotskygrad.
Reckon he would have gotten behind the German, French and Italian Communists efforts to run their countries and meddled so much in the Spanish Civil War that WW2 would be a war on communism playing out in Western Europe.
 

S.Kennedy

Well-known member
Killing off the entirety of your officer corps in the 1930s army purges left the Red Army woefully short of experienced officers during Barbarossa and paranoid, fearful of ''mission command'' initiative, committed to head-on attacks. These institutional weaknesses were evident in The Winter War. Also, officers were hampered by NKVD commissars.

About industrialising, you've to remember that the localities at least of Soviet industrialising were overran in 1941. The Soviets relocated their industries across the Urals, but this took time.
 
Last edited:

Spark

Global Moderator
anything positive from stalin's industrialisation programmes in the 30s is vastly outweighed by his decision to kill the NEP
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Trotsky was more interested in spreading revolutions to other countries as he felt Russia at the time couldn't match the capitalist countries.

The only way this would've helped if he somehow nixed NAZI Germany before it even began.
 

S.Kennedy

Well-known member
Of course, World Communism, vis-à-vis ''Socialism in One Country'' held by Stalin and Bukharin, adopted by the Comintern 1926.
 

harsh.ag

Well-known member
Trotsky was more interested in spreading revolutions to other countries as he felt Russia at the time couldn't match the capitalist countries.

The only way this would've helped if he somehow nixed NAZI Germany before it even began.
Think we should all agree that all this talk of how Trotsky would have done against Hitler in WWII overlooks the fact that Trotsky would have started the communist revolution in Germany in the 20s itself had he come to power. Nazi Germany may never have existed and Europe would be a whole different kind of mess.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Could easily see a military intervention in those circumstances tbh. It's a curious alternate history scenario.
 

S.Kennedy

Well-known member
Well the Germans did have a communist revolution 1918-19, or to put it more correctly a series of revolutions. They were quelled by the Freikorps.
 

harsh.ag

Well-known member
"The more impotent the police regime of the Nazi is in the field of national economy, the more it is forced to transfer its efforts to the field of foreign policy. This corresponds fully to the inner dynamics of German capitalism, aggressive through and through. The sudden turn of the Nazi leaders to peaceful declarations could deceive only utter simpletons. What other method remains at Hitler’s disposal to transfer the responsibility for internal distresses to external enemies and to accumulate under the press of the dictatorship the explosive force of nationalism? This part of the program, outlined openly even prior to the Nazis” assumption of power, is now being fulfilled with iron logic before the eyes of the world. The date of the new European catastrophe will be determined by the time necessary for the arming of Germany. It is not a question of months, but neither is it a question of decades. It will be but a few years before Europe is again plunged into a war, unless Hitler is forestalled in time by the inner forces of Germany."

November 2, 1933
 
Top