***Official*** Australia in India 2017

[Shri]

Why such dramatic intro music for what is quite possibly the most boring video on the internet

Two steps from hell, ****.

 

[Gob]

 

[GotSpin]

He's probably hitting them well in the nets. You guys just don't get it

 

[Spikey]

do you think lehmann and wade are even letting him play in the nets

 

[Hennybogan]

Lol, I've literally never seen anyone on CW with selections that are so far off the mark. Kudos.

Thank you, I know the one the selectors pick will be a straight swap for starc and marsh depends on pitch Cummins/bird and maxwell/Stoinis/agar. I think the team I came up with would go much better

 

[Gob]

Thank you, I know the one the selectors pick will be a straight swap for starc and marsh depends on pitch Cummins/bird and maxwell/Stoinis/agar. I think the team I came up with would go much better

nah

 

[ImpatientLime]

its been a while since the aussie selectors got funky fresh on us.

 

[anil1405]

 

[srbhkshk]

View attachment 23237

If you can still be recognized, you haven't really played. Weak.

 

[Tangles]

Stoinis is a horrible call if it happens. Also odd that they pick a guy nearly averaging 50 because of "his bowling". Clearly I'm missing something.

Who's averaging 50? Stoinis isn't unless you mean with the ball.

 

[Shri]

Wtf? Brett Lee is a brunette now?

 

[Compton]

Wtf? Brett Lee is a brunette now?

He always was, right? He just dyed it blonde.

 

[morgieb]

Who's averaging 50? Stoinis isn't unless you mean with the ball.

Yeah I did.

 

[Gnske]

do you think lehmann and wade are even letting him play in the nets

Probably tell him to wait until everyone is packed up and ready to leave at the end of the day to go into the nets and that if he's lucky Saker might throw him down a couple.

Abhorrent treatment of IPL Captain Glenn Maxwell if you ask me.

 

[stephen]

Reports are now coming out saying that the ICC has rated the Bengalaru pitch "very good".

FFS if that wasn't evidence of corruption in the ICC, nothing will be. You don't get shooters on a day 1 pitch if the pitch is very good.

 

[morgieb]

Reports are now coming out saying that the ICC has rated the Bengalaru pitch "very good".

FFS if that wasn't evidence of corruption in the ICC, nothing will be. You don't get shooters on a day 1 pitch if the pitch is very good.

Giving that good but Pune "poor" seems very strange, yes. Felt Bangalore was a fair bit worse due to the inconsistent bounce.

Frankly though while neither wicket was great they did at least produce good cricket.

 

[Gnske]

Reports are now coming out saying that the ICC has rated the Bengalaru pitch "very good".

FFS if that wasn't evidence of corruption in the ICC, nothing will be. You don't get shooters on a day 1 pitch if the pitch is very good.

ICC as consistent on this matter as Renshaw's bowel movements.

 

[stephen]

The thing is that they have guidelines on what constitutes a good or poor pitch and that pitch didn't meet any of the guidelines for a good pitch.

 

[Hennybogan]

$$$$

 

[honestbharani]

Lol.. ICC are idiots but this has nothing to do with BCCI influence. Since Manohar came in, they have tried to do everything they can to try and limit BCCI as Manohar wants the power for himself. I would say the Pune rating was more to do with the ICC political influence than this one.


I dont think you rate a pitch poor just because it turns. So for me, neither pitch was bad at all but if you had to rate one of them poor, I would have rated the Bangalore one more worse than Pune, for sure.