• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*OLD* T20 Discussion and Results

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magrat Garlick

Global Moderator
net run rate calculations

West Robbham 5-2 +0.4985 (1246 / 136.4 vs 1175 / 136.2)
East Robbham 5-2 +0.1224 (1070 / 136.3 vs 1016 / 131.4)
Masters 4-3 +0.6589 (907 / 117.5 vs 976 / 138.4)
Fardingham 4-3 +0.6467 (1205 / 137.1 vs 1138 / 139.5)
Davistow 4-3 +0.5340 (1138 / 135.3 vs 1084 / 137.5)
Mørkambe 3-4 -0.0480 (989 / 134 vs 1040 / 140)
Garven Island 2-5 -1.5824 (904 / 136.2 vs 976 / 118.5)
Nixonstown 1-6 -0.9356 (1034 / 139.3 vs 1088 / 130.2)
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Well-known member
Cocked it up, but with the Dazzlers calculation. How disappointing for them.

EDIT: Seen the mistake. A rogue 40 runs...
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Well-known member
Disappointed for the Dazzlers now. Relieved the Cocks get the chance to Ram things home, but that's incredibly harsh.

I heard they'd even printed a load of, "We made the Semis" t-shirts and "We Love the Clap!" bandannas.

Did the Dazzlers beat the Masters? If so, I think they should go through and the Masters go out!
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Well-known member
Well, in that case a carefully targetted smear campaign could see the Masters thrown out and the Dazzlers through?

I'm sure I saw the Masters' captain wearing a shiny new leather jacket the other day... :ph34r:
 

Agent TBY

Well-known member
Wouldn't be too fair, tbf. We really should've won that. Conceding 20 runs to Saqlain might as well be a crime.

I blame my lack of wickets.
 

Simon

WCC Staff
not too much of a shock we qualified for the finals, the more surprising thing is that we didnt finish first.
 

Mister Wright

Well-known member
Disappointing not to bring the result home in the last over, but after all the confusion I think we've made the semis now?

If we have, excellent chance now, and if we haven't it was a really good comp for the Cockatoos anyway.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Ninjas vs Mathemagicians
Bowling:
1. MU Amir
2. AA Cameron
3. EAP McNamara
4. J Nixon
5. GS Gooljar
6. PR Sajith
Scorecard said:
Bowling Figures for Ninjas

O M R W
MU Amir 4 0 37 0
AA Cameron 4 0 27 3
EAP McNamara 4 0 49 0
J Nixon 3 0 18 0
SE Fuller 3 0 43 0
MW Wilson 2 0 6 0
I know it doesn't mean much as we had no chance of making the finals etc, but it's frustrating when you name a bowling order that doesn't eventuate. One off I can understand, but this happened about three times AFAIK. Probably has something to do with default XIs, but IIRC Liam you were editing the database on a round by round basis so each one would be a 'one off', so to speak, so we could have custom bowling orders.

I am sounding like a bitch, and I don't want to criticize what's been a fun tournament, but it was just a bit frustrating is all.
 

mikeW

Well-known member
Disapointing way to end the tournament. Can't wait to get back and playing in the real stuff for the Colts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top