No.
I got 0 as the answer but not I’m not so sure.The answer is tn the solving of the equation you posted.
the standard model lagrangian written properly is actually very neat and tidy; the version on the coffee cup in the article howe posted is much more illuminating. (edit: albeit probably incorrect unless you assume there's hidden 1/2s lying around)That makes me thankful I didn't study Physics. A transistor h-parameter equation in analog electronics was enough to make my head swim in college.
you can certainly solve it. shove it into the euler-lagrange equations and it will, one day, give you an answer. the answer would alas be completely useless as we are doing quantum, not classical, field theory.Looks like a formula rather than an equation. Spark to confirm, assuming it's the physics I think it looks like
Edit:
So it's the Standard Model equation, so I guess it is an equation if you're not a pedant. Either way, you can't 'solve' it.
Breakdown here: https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation
Shut up you tit.Yeah the equation defines the number of posts you should make.
Had no idea it was even that sort of functional. I'm a simple man who wants his functionals to have integration signs at least. Throw me a boneyou can certainly solve it. shove it into the euler-lagrange equations and it will, one day, give you an answer. the answer would alas be completely useless as we are doing quantum, not classical, field theory.
Shut up you tit.
What are you even supposed to solve for, it has like 125490128 unknownsHad no idea it was even that sort of functional. I'm a simple man who wants his functionals to have integration signs at least. Throw me a bone
dS = 0What are you even supposed to solve for, it has like 125490128 unknowns
Lambda?