Ehhhh I don't think it's a coincidence that this incredibly unstable period of Aus politics since 2009/10 has coincided with Abbott being a major player.Gotta love all the knifing going on when it’s the Libs who generally accuse the other side of being all out for themselves.
It ain’t just Abbott neither. Remove him and the problem remains. Political class has rarely been so fractured in Oz one would think?
I hate Abbott as much as the next guy but I do think this is largely a coincidence. Other culturally-similar western countries have not been a beacon of political stability in this period either; it's goes beyond Australia.Ehhhh I don't think it's a coincidence that this incredibly unstable period of Aus politics since 2009/10 has coincided with Abbott being a major player.
I'm still not 100% convinced he has supporters, he's just a sort of vaguely acceptable placeholder to trigger a challenge for Abbott to step in.how does peter dutton have any supporters let alone the numbers
Yeah that'd be fair. I guess conservatives are a big chunk of the party, it's the delcons who are Abbott diehards and there's about a dozen of those at most.The murmurs for the past year have been that the conservatives themselves think Abbott is finished also, Dutton is the highest profile MP of that faction and Sco Mo blew his chance as the next leader as he’s accused of backstabbing Abbott. Can’t see Abbott being elected leader again.
I tend to not lump white nationalists with white supremacists and while I'd consider the latter racist the former is a bit too nuanced for that allegation. Otherwise, most of the world is racist (indeed, it may be if you're being consistent ). The WAP for me isn't entirely racist (I guess it depends who is arguing for it and what exactly) because I think much of the argument is about culture, although it's something I'd never vote for because I don't think this is really the impediment for cultural integration and is an excuse on a slippery slope.For mine Richard Howard clearly wrote the speech (or at the very least, that part of it). I've met him a couple of times and at heart he's just a troll. He absolutely thinks saying completely out of bounds stuff is the best tactic for micro-right parliamentarians, especially if they can find a way to give the words they use a double-meaning. "Final solution" really was just a completely textbook Richard Howard troll.
Fraser Anning pretty clearly does suppoort the WAP - he has not denied this even after the speech, so if you think the WAP is racist (and I fail to see how it could not be), then yeah. But I don't think he supports the "final solution" or what that represents, and the poor bugger probably wasn't even aware why Richard had worded it that way, so that was for the attention.
Ugh, disgusting.Yeah I guess if I were to lay out my opinions to the relevant questions, it'd be:
- Fraser Anning endorses the White Australia Policy, at least for new immigrants
- On top of this, he's anti-Muslim to the point of wanting to deport all Muslims to whichever country will take them
- Richard Howard, essentially a race-baiting libertarian, helped him with his speech, and straight up wrote large segments of it, including the controversial line
- Neither Anning nor Howard believe in the "final solution" as loosely indicated
- Howard knew how people would react to phrasing, Anning didn't
- Neither are disappointed by it
- The media have played into their hands; both will benefit
So in short, Anning is a racist but not a Nazi, Howard isn't really either but is a professional troll, and this will help both of them.
- The culture that birthed the (written, formalised) legal system was not white.I tend to not lump white nationalists with white supremacists and while I'd consider the latter racist the former is a bit too nuanced for that allegation. Otherwise, most of the world is racist (indeed, it may be if you're being consistent ). The WAP for me isn't entirely racist (I guess it depends who is arguing for it and what exactly) because I think much of the argument is about culture, although it's something I'd never vote for because I don't think this is really the impediment for cultural integration and is an excuse on a slippery slope.
The problem for someone like me who was raised a muslim and from a middle-eastern country is that the leftists have totally lost me with their racist, identity politics driven agenda to get power and to demean white people. At the same time I obviously don't support racists on the right-wing because that'll do me no good in the long run either. I can at least appreciate that Australia was culturally white (however you want to define that I guess) and that the greatness of Australia lies in the culture that birthed the legal system and social bonds. I recognise and think it is a good thing to promote these. I don't want Australia to become so sensitive to cultures that people stop saying Merry Christmas because it might offend someone. If someone foreign comes here they should have to learn the culture and language, the rest of the country shouldn't have to lose their traditions to appease them.
Ugh, disgusting.