In an alternate universe, a USSR led by Trotsky would have been such a paradise that Germany would have willingly joined it and Nazism would never have risen int eh first place.in an alternate universe a USSR lead by Trotsky probably would've lost WWII tbh
Nah I locked it on purpose as a gag after sledger's "thread over" post, figuring harsh would get the joke and just re-open it immediately. Instead though he left it closed but tried to argue with me about my decision on my VM wall, thinking I had decided communism was a banned topic or something.Caught harsh locking the thread by accident
wait whatin an alternate universe a USSR lead by Trotsky probably would've lost WWII tbh
I’m offended by this postCan't expect libertarians to have a sense of humour now
How do you square your heightened nationalism with your Trotskyite communism Burgey? You should be looking at Pommie workers as fella comrades, the equal of their Australian brethren. L'Internationalel and all? ''World Communism''? Really there is little time for nationalism in classical communism.In an alternate universe, a USSR led by Trotsky would have been such a paradise that Germany would have willingly joined it and Nazism would never have risen int eh first place.
I assumed you were a nationalist for espousing the most nationalist antipodean nationalism imaginable the wrong side of Alan Border, and for being a communist, in this very conversation waxing lyrical on Leon Trotsky. My apologies olde boy.I square it by not being either of those things, yet taking joy in having people like you think I am.
The clue is in the word dogmatic (and synonyms).When did disliking one dogmatic ideology mean that you could not dislike all the other dogmatic ideologies?