• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Chances of a 12 team tournament in 2019?

Spark

Global Moderator
really not sure why people keep yelling at the icc except as shorthand to yell at ca/ecb/bcci
 

Jezroy

Well-known member
I like a 12 team contest, with a top 6 playoffs.

2 pools of 6, top qualifier goes through to the semi final.

A2 plays B3, B3 plays A2 in knock outs.

To pick the 12 teams, the top 8 qualify automatically, and then there is a tournament for the next 8 to qualify for the last four spots. Straight league system. 7 games each. No knockouts.
 

_Ed_

Well-known member
They did last time, but I feel like it happened earlier than this. So now I'm not sure.
 

Rotkohl

Active member
A bit of digging unearths that on 10-04-2011 the ICC reiterated its decision to cut down the number to 10 - ICC news: ICC confirms 10 teams for next two World Cups | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo

And then reinstated them on 26 june at the annunanl conference - ICC annual conference: Associates included in 2015 World Cup | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo



So there's some hope, even if it isnt a lot. It is important that journos and former players keep making noise so that this issue isnt swept under the carpet until the day the draws are made
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
It's not interesting at all, it's a completely logical decision to make.

We just follow a sport that refuses to acknowledge logic.
 

hendrix

Well-known member
Any chance of the ICC flipping on this
They flipped last time but:
a) Srinivasan
b) The big 3 is now totally in charge of things.

The only way to get them to change is massive public pressure that's likely to have massive financial consequences - e.g. sponsors dropping off, people refusing to watch, players refusing to play.

It makes no sense from any perspective apart from the very, very short term reduced costs for the ECB of only having 10 teams to host.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
They flipped last time but:
a) Srinivasan
b) The big 3 is now totally in charge of things.

The only way to get them to change is massive public pressure that's likely to have massive financial consequences - e.g. sponsors dropping off, people refusing to watch, players refusing to play.

It makes no sense from any perspective apart from the very, very short term reduced costs for the ECB of only having 10 teams to host.
on the other hand, giles clarke will be gone soon
 
Top