Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Neither of these categories tend to describe me very well, much as I wish they did.A normal anarchist or a person who cares about living
Neither of these categories tend to describe me very well, much as I wish they did.A normal anarchist or a person who cares about living
Classic normal anarchist response.Neither of these categories tend to describe me very well, much as I wish they did.
Not for long then.I don't think having a state is entirely necessary to solve the issue, and even if I did I'd honestly rather live with the absestos than live with the State.
Resign from being a Mod then, ****I'm an anarchist.
Being a mod of a privately owned forum doesn't go against his ideals. He's not asking you to pay up just so you can post here (although in your case maybe he should).Resign from being a Mod then, ****
To be fair to zorax and his **** trolling there, some anarchists oppose all heirarchy. I'm regularly told that I'm "not a real anarchist" by such people, but I don't really care what label you give me. If I'm not a real anarchist that's fine -- I still think everything I believe is internally consistent regardless of what it's called. I think voluntaryist fits me best but it's a also a crap inside baseball term so I used anarchist there.Being a mod of a privately owned forum doesn't go against his ideals. He's not asking you to pay up just so you can post here (although in your case maybe he should).
I'm still absolutely a libertarian ftr; I've just followed it to what I think is its natural conclusion. There are lots of anarchists in the 'libertarian movement' for lack of a better phrase and we mostly get along fine with the non-anarchists.i understand that you’re an anarchist and not a full blown libertarian now but i would assume you’d still heavily identify and relate to large parts of libertarianism
so here’s my question; how does it make you feel that especially in the west many prominent libertarians and self identified libertarians or free speech advocates or small government advocates nowadays don’t actually stand for those things when they’re put under scrutiny, and really most of them are just neocons who want to say the n word and not get harangued for doing it
Yeah this sucks.how does it make you feel that especially in the west many prominent libertarians and self identified libertarians or free speech advocates or small government advocates nowadays don’t actually stand for those things when they’re put under scrutiny, and really most of them are just neocons who want to say the n word and not get harangued for doing it
i imagine all of those "intellectual darkweb" types **** you up the wall too for the same reasonI'm still absolutely a libertarian ftr; I've just followed it to what I think is its natural conclusion. There are lots of anarchists in the 'libertarian movement' for lack of a better phrase and we mostly get along fine with the non-anarchists.
As for the question:
Yeah this sucks.
i can sympathizeYeah this sucks.
Presumably it would be that a society can still be a society without an overarching state that needs to use force, so you would see voluntary quarantines without force, private testing and treatment and allocation of resources etc etc.Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but what is the Cribbertopia way of dealing with a pandemic? Plow on and let survival of the fittest decide things?
Not my thread either and obvs I don't agree with it, but it's a categorical philosophy. If it produces bad outcomes then it produces bad outcomes - that doesn't make it OK to use violence to try to engineer different outcomes.Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but what is the Cribbertopia way of dealing with a pandemic? Plow on and let survival of the fittest decide things?