Starfighter
Well-known member
Not worth it.
Really, really not worth it.
Really, really not worth it.
Last edited:
I'd have an discussion/argument over this, but I think our views on economics (both its theories and its worth as a whole) are too different to ever come even close to understanding each other's view points, let alone agreeing on anything. Needless to say I have read plenty such papers and considered them.remember kids, if you believe literally all the reputable economic evidence re: the link between migration and economic growth, wage growth, aggregate demand and unemployment then you’re just a propagandist and a shill for real estate agents
Mate that was the one thing I wanted to avoid. Don't need to drag race into this the way he did.That basically looked like a watson post.
>costs on an individual level from our historically high levels of immigration are greater than the benefitsdespite likely disagreeing with you starfighter, id be willing to read that if i wasn't so lazy. is there a short version in the works?
Then I will make it very blunt.I'd have an discussion/argument over this, but I think our views on economics (both its theories and its worth as a whole) are too different to ever come even close to understanding each other's view points, let alone agreeing on anything. Needless to say I have read plenty such papers and considered them.
Sounds about rightyou know what actually, objectively makes life harder for immigrants? innumerate evidence free trash like “accepting <1% of your population level each year as migrants is the reason the economy is **** for young people” leading to bullshit like me having to save well over $15k for the apparently generation-destroying privilege of allowing my postgrad-educated partner to move to australia because they’ll apparently leech off the infrastructure and use up all the water resources of a catchment in which they don’t even live.
ok so the winston peters stance then.>costs on an individual level from our historically high levels of immigration are greater than the benefits
>effect on our current labour market is deleterious due to our high level of available labour compared to job creation
>certain industries which benefit from it have an outsize influence
That's pretty much it.
Can we do this in VMs please?ok so the winston peters stance then.
what if immigrants are doing the jobs born australians don't want to do, or are not producing people for (to be blunt, the likes of dairies and also high skill shortages)?
how do you respond to immigrants coming to aus to create their own businesses (dairies, takeaway shops, foreign cuisine restaurants etc)? these create greater consumer choice, expand the economy and have historically always been minimum wage or just above. would wages here not benefit more from a minimum wage increase rather than a reduction of immigration?
Worry about your own country, ****. We don't need your lotok so the winston peters stance then.
what if immigrants are doing the jobs born australians don't want to do, or are not producing people for (to be blunt, the likes of dairies and also high skill shortages)?
how do you respond to immigrants coming to aus to create their own businesses (dairies, takeaway shops, foreign cuisine restaurants etc)? these create greater consumer choice, expand the economy and have historically always been minimum wage or just above. would wages here not benefit more from a minimum wage increase rather than a reduction of immigration?
lies. you're all lining up to play for the warriors ffs. the ****in warriors.Worry about your own country, ****. We don't need your lot