The best part of Catan is the social aspect. Getting people to gang up on the person who they think is winning, and convincing them to trade with you instead.....I quite like collaborative board games, it appeals to the same part of my brain that DnD does.
Catan doesn't sit right with me and it bugs me that people hold it up as the apex of board game design because it's all strategy and little randomisation. That just means the object of the game is to scheme your way into ****ing other people over. It's like the opposite of fun.
What is also fun, although might not make you very popular, is to trade away one resource and then play the monopoly card...The best part of Catan is the social aspect. Getting people to gang up on the person who they think is winning, and convincing them to trade with you instead.....
Yeah that sounds about right.Think the way I'd put it is that it's much easier to get a fun social experience with board games than video games, with far fewer risks of annoyances. But the highs aren't quite as high.
I’ve been playing a lot of chess in the past three monthsChess and Scrabble are two old but very good board games.
Of modern ones I am not a huge fan of Catan but it is okay.
Recently played a new one which I really enjoyed, Clank!
Yep, they're great games. Backgammon's another oldie but goodie.Chess and Scrabble are two old but very good board games.
Yeah I see what you mean but I don't agree. The satisfaction from playing a board game well isn't as strong but I'd have the board game moments when you laugh so hard you can't breathe as higher highs.Think the way I'd put it is that it's much easier to get a fun social experience with board games than video games, with far fewer risks of annoyances. But the highs aren't quite as high.
I've had plenty of those moment in some shooters tbfYeah I see what you mean but I don't agree. The satisfaction from playing a board game well isn't as strong but I'd have the board game moments when you laugh so hard you can't breathe as higher highs.
I said that but I'm going to retroactively change what I said and say that board games are better than most multiplayer video games these days. Video games are way better at the single player experience.A little off-topic but it's following on from a discussion that happened in this thread ages back: whoever said that physical board games are more fun than most video games these days was correct.
edit: moved out of the gaming thread
I literally bought a physical copy of Doom 2016 yesterday and went to play it last night and discovered it needed 4h of downloading. I thought "That can't be right" and checked the back of the box - 55gb of hard drive space required. A DVD generally only contains around 8gb.if I buy Ticket To Ride I can just open it up and play it. Who wants that from a game? I want to load it up and then get told to download a 7gb update and play it four days later
Downloaded BF5 for my laptop and it's, like, 70gb download.I literally bought a physical copy of Doom 2016 yesterday and went to play it last night and discovered it needed 4h of downloading. I thought "That can't be right" and checked the back of the box - 55gb of hard drive space required. A DVD generally only contains around 8gb.
So I bought a game and have to download 45gb or more? Crazy. Makes reading the rules for a new board game much more tolerable.